Ir al contenido principal

Analysing: SHOULD CHIMPANZEES BE CONSIDERED ‘PERSONS’?

  1. SHOULD CHIMPANZEES BE CONSIDERED ‘PERSONS’?

    v  Whose viewpoint is expressed?
    In this opinion article the writer is expressing their frustration for trying to help two chimpanzees which are in captivity. He is claiming the freedom to Kiko and Tommy (the chimpanzees), and what he wants is to help them, but the United States law don’t want to help because they consider animals as a thing, and laws claim for the protection of a person not a thing.
    His viewpoint is that chimpanzees are not only a “thing” they are more than that. They have all of the features that a human seem as a person has: conscious experience, emotionality, a sense of self or bonds of care or interdependence.  

    v  What does the author want us to think?
    He wants us to reflect about considering chimpanzees just as a thing. As he said, Kiko and Tommy as well as humans have are capable of communicating through language (in their case signal language), they fell, and they have emotions, and so on.

    v  What viewpoint is not expressed? Whose voice do we not hear?
    I think the author take into account the two viewpoints. At the end he did a contrast about the complexity of that issue and what he thought.

    v  What is an alternative perspective of the text?
    I think it is to reflect about the viewpoint we have about animals. According to the issue he is trying to deal, he is still trying to find a way to help those both chimpanzees.

    v  Can you think of other questions this text responds to?
    I think that chimpanzees neither are a person nor a thing. I think that being a person is only a feature of humans as well as, it is important to say that not all humans are become a person. Nevertheless, there are animals which behave very similar as humans do, it is not enough for becoming a person. Being a person required more developed skills.
    But also it is important to know that animals (chimpanzees) are not things. They feel and they are able to do many interesting things. However, not for that they become on a person. As a conclusion I think the main stuff is to reflect and learn to respect animals as well as claim for the preservation of different species.


Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

TOWARDS ECOPEDAGOGY: WEAVING A BROAD-BASED PEDAGOGY OF LIBERATION FOR ANIMALS, NATURE, AND THE OPPRESSED PEOPLE OF THE EARTH

Questions Knowledge Competence Ø   Who are The Enemies of Nature, according to Joel Kovel? Ø   Name what are the damages that Giants biomass nets are causing? Ø   What is the purpose of popular education? Ø   List the different types of literacy according to Jim Cummins and Dennis Sayers effectively Ø   How much have been increasing the human population? Comprehension competence Ø   Describe how the modern environmental movement has helped to transformation? Ø   What did you interpret about poverty? Describe this issue. Ø   Summarize what is Environmental Education. Ø   Differentiate the methodology used in the “Zoo School” and that one that is use in a regular school. Ø   What do you understand about Neoliberalism? Analysis Competence Ø   Gregory Batenson stated that the basic ecological unit of survival is “organism plus environment.” How do you explain that relation? Ø   Explain, how the...

Michael Sandel: What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets

REFLECTION  How does Michael Sandel support the thesis that "over the past three decades we have drifted from having a market economy to becoming a market society?" He defined a market economy as “a tool, a valuable and effective tool for organizing productive activity”. Its means having a balance economy. But a Market society  as Sandel said “it’s a way of life where market values and market thinking reach in two spheres of life previously governed by other values” It means that everything it is a society where just about everything is up for sale, everybody wants to buy everything. What sorts of arguments are offered for and against the assumed proposal of paying young children two dollars for every book they read? Against: The first one is that students just for getting the money will read “stupid books”, they will read bad books which are not going to help them. Another important one, and for me, the strongest one, was about d eveloping passion and love...